Performance analysis of Turkish banking sector: CAMELS implementation

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

2020-07-30

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

PressAcademia

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Özet

Purpose- These effects lead to many crises in the country, especially the economic crisis, and may result in serious chaos environments. In order not to experience these situations, the banking sector must be under audit and observation. One of the most important actions to be taken for this audit and observation is the regular measurement of financial performance analysis of banks. CAMELS analysis is a globally accepted system for this performance analysis. Camels analysis measures banks with components of capital adequacy, asset quality, management quality, profitability, liquidity and sensitivity to market risks. Methodology- In this study, a total of 16 banks, 2 separate bank groups operating in the Turkish banking sector, 13 of which are private capital banks, 3 of which are Public Banks, were subjected to CAMELS analysis for 16 separate periods taking into account the balance sheets at the end of 2003 and 2018. Findings- According to the results of the study, among the banks, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ziraat Bankası A.Ş., Akbank T.A.Ş. ve Türkiye Garanti Bankası A.Ş. among the groups, it was observed that the group of Public Banks perform a stronger performance than other banks and groups. Conclusion- The fact that all banks and bank groups operating in the Turkish banking sector have a stronger performance in the coming process will undoubtedly create a more appropriate level of economic prosperity for every structure in the state and individual scale in Turkey's economic sense.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

Banks, Financial performance, CAMELS, Turkish banks, Basel standards

Kaynak

PressAcademia Procedia

WoS Q Değeri

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

11

Sayı

1

Künye

Koç, C. & Teker, D. (2020). Performance analysis of Turkish banking sector: CAMELS implementation. PressAcademia Procedia, 11(1), 216-218. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1270