Wage determination under collective bargaining : inflation, productivity and profitabgility relationships (an empirical study)

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-8349-607X
dc.contributor.advisorDereli, Tokeren_US
dc.contributor.authorSoykut Sarıca, Yeşim Pınaren_US
dc.contributor.otherIşık Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Çağdaş İşletme Yönetimi Doktora Programıen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-28T04:54:02Z
dc.date.available2016-06-28T04:54:02Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentIşık Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Çağdaş İşletme Yönetimi Doktora Programıen_US
dc.descriptionText in English ; Abstract: English and Turkishen_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 225-238)en_US
dc.descriptionxix, 276 leavesen_US
dc.description.abstractThe dissertation focuses on disclosing the link between objective bargaining criteria(i.e the inflation rate,labour productivity,comparative wages and ability to pay)and the realized wage outcomes in Turkey. The extent to which each of the driteria is effective in the determination of the wage outcome in Turkey,this focus constitutes the main significance of the proposed study. The set of changes brought about by collective bargaining in Turkey has implications for the standard of living of wage earners, the welfare of the firms and the economy in general.The broad problem are is the role of criteria used in wage determination under collective bargaining in major firms of the Turkish economy. The problem definition is defining the effect of bargaining criteria discussed in indurtrial relations literature on the determination of wages in selected unionized ISE-100 Companies from 1998 until 2005.A survey of Turkey's related labour unions and employers' associations was conducted,using the face-to-face interview method. Kruskal Wallis analysis, Cross Tabulation analysis and Spearman Correlation analysis were then used to test the proposed framework.The study attempts to shed light on the determinants of the ISE-100 companies' wages by using panel data on the firms from 1998-2005.In particular it tries to extend the results by focusing on the roles of certain factors in wage determination by also constructing an Econometric Model,using the Panel Least Square analysis in order to test the proposed framework. Overall all the dimensions of the model were found to be effective in wage determination.however,the effects of each criterion seem to vary.Thus,it was possible under some circumtances for example to determine exactly what increas in wages was required to compenste for changes in comparative wages. However,the results suggest that inflation emerges as the most important criterion,followed by wage comparisons used most widely in collective bargaining. The link between wage bargaining criteria and the economic environment of the country in relation to wage levels.The findings are expected to contribute to research concerning the industrial relation system of Turkey.en_US
dc.description.abstractBu tez çalışması, toplu pazarlık sürecinde kullanılan pazarlık kriterleriyle (enflasyon oranı, işgücü verimliliği, sektördeki emsal ücretler ve şirketin karlılığı) Türkiye'de gerçekleşmiş nihai ücretler arasındaki bağlantıyı göstermesi açısından önem taşımaktadır. Toplu pazarlığın sonuçlanmasıyla oluşan oluşum ücretlerinin yaşam standardı, firmaların pazar durumları ve ekonominin gidişatı açısından önemlidir. Çalışmada araştıralacak konu ücret belirleme sırasında önde gelen Türk firmalarında toplu pazarlık sırasında ele alınan kriterlerin neler olduğunu saptamaktadır. Bu amaçla İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsa'sında 1998-2005 yılları arasında en fazla ilk 100 firma arasında yer alan firmalardan işveren sendikasına üye ve toplu iş sözleşmesi bağıtlayan 50 tanesinin toplu pazarlık sırasında kullandıkları pazarlık kriterlerini incelemeye çalıştım. Veriler, seçilen firmaların bağlı bulunduğu işçi ve işveren sendikalarındaki toplu sözleşme uzmanlarına ya da yönetim kurulu üyelerine yüz yüze anket yönetimi uygulaması yoluyla toplanmıştır. Önerilen model, Kruskal Wallis testi, Çapraz Tablo analizi ve Spearman Korelasyon analizi yollarıyla sınanmıştır. Bu amaçla 1998-2005 yılları arasında seçilen IMKB'ye bağlı seçilmiş firmaların panel verileri kullanılarak çalışmayı bir de ekonometrik açıdan regresyon analizi uygularak genişlettim. Bu çalışmada seçilen firmaların ücret oluşumundaki 1998-2005 dönemlerinde gerçekleşen toplu pazarlık kriterlerinin etkisini araştırmaya çalıştım. Modelin bütün boyutlarının, ücret oluşundaki etkisi olduğu görülmüştür. Ancak toplu pazarlık kriterlerinin gösterdikleri etkiler, içinde bulunan şartlara göre farklılık göstermektedir. Uygulanacak ücret artışı çalışanların hayat pahalılığıyla olan mücadelesinde farklı, verimlilik göstergelerindeki değişikliklerde farklılık ve sektördeki emsal ücretlerin gösterdiği trend göz önüne alındığında farklı olacaktır. Ancak araştırma sonuçları, tarafların en önem verdiği faktörün, enflasyon kriteri olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca araştırma ücret oluşumunu belirleyen faktörler arasında sektördeki benzer ücretlerin önemli derecede etkili bir kriter olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Görgül bulgular kurama uygundur ve ücret oluşumunda ücret pazarlık kriterleri kadar ekonomik koşulların da rol oynadığını kanıtlamaktadır. Sonuçların, endüstri ilişkileri sistemi araştırmalarına bir katkı yapacağı düşünülmektedir.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDefinition of Major Terms in Wages and Collective Bargainingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWageen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage from Different Perspectivesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage from Labour’s Perspectiveen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage from Employer’s Perspectiveen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsEmployers’ Union’s Functionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage from the National Economy Perspectiveen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage from the Labour Union’s Perspectiveen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determinationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCollective Bargainingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStructure of Collective Bargainingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsThe Union Structureen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsThe Employer Structureen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCollective Bargaining Negotiationsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPreparation of Negotiationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSources of Informationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsNegotiation Encounteren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCollective Agreementen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsHow Wage Rates are Defined in the Agreement?en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFlat Rate (Standard Rate), Pay Range Systemen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDeferred Wage Increasesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCost-of-Living Adjustmentsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProfit Sharingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTwo-Tier Wage Systemsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLump-Sum Paymentsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDetermination of the Basic Wage Rateen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCriteria for Wage Determinationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsComparative Wageen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTypes of Comparisonsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsOpponents Views on Using the Comparative Normen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbility to Payen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsOpponents Views on Using Ability-to-Pay Considerationsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCost of Livingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsNominal Wage Increases and Inflationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsEscalator Clauses Arrangementsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Re-Openers Arrangementsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProductivityen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProblem of Measurement Productivityen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProductivity Bargainingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLabour Market Indicators for Turkeyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLabour Market Analysisen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsThe Structural Adjustment of the Labour Market in Turkeyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLabour Market in Turkeyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsInformal Labour Market in Turkeyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsLabour Productivity in Turkeyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsEconomic Environmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCompetitionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTurkey and EU Labour Market Policiesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsThe Periods of Unionization and Factors Which Affect Unionization in Turkeyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAn Overview of Turkish Unions Todayen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsUnion Density in Turkeyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStrikeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsThird Party Intervention in Negotiationsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWhy Managers Resist Unions?en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsMethodology of the Researchen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProblem Definitionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsIstanbul Stock Exchange Company’s Qualificationsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsThe Reliability Analysis of the Measurement Instrumentsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDescriptive Non-Inferential Statisticsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalyses of Wage Determination Criteriaen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Wage Determination Criteria for Labour Unionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Wage Determination Criteria for Employers Unionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Wage Determination Criteria Using Mann Whitney Testen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Criteria in Fixing Wage Demandsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Fixing Wage Demands Criteria for Labour Unionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Fixing Wage Demands Criteria for Employers Unionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Fixing Wage Demands Criteria for Using Mann Whitney Testen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Intervening Variables Effects on Wage Determinationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Intervening Variables for Wage Setting from Labour Unions Perspectiveen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Intervening Variables for Wage Setting from Employers Unions Perspectiveen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Intervening Variables for Wage Determination, Using Mann Whitney Testen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of the Importance of Negative Factors in Wage Bargainingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Negative Factors for Labour Unions in Wage Bargainingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Negative Factors for Employers Unions in Wage Bargainingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsUsing Mann Whitney Test; Analysis of the Negative Factors Effecten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis on the Advantage of Wage Policyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Advantage of Wage Policy for Labour Unionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Advantage of Wage Policy for Employers Unionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsUsing Mann Whitney Test on “Advantage of Wage Policy”en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Union’s Bargaining Poweren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalyses of the Hypothesis, that Wage Increases Narrow Wage Differentialsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFlat Rate Wage Increase Methoden_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPercentage Wise Wage Increase Methoden_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsInformation Relating to Structure of Wagesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Effects of Skill Wage Differentials on Business Costsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Effects of Type of Differentiation on Business Costsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Perceiving the Wage Concepten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of the Effects of Reductions in the Payroll Taxes Ease on Negotiationsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Perceiving Welfare Share Differentlyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalyses Reflecting of Changes in CPI to Compensate for Losses in Real Wagesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Reflecting Changes in CPI to Compensate for Lossesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Changes in Inflation Criterion Bringing the Purchasing Power to Desired Levelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalyses of the Use of Actual Inflation Levelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalyses of the Productivity Criterionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProductivity Reflected onto Wagesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFinal Wage Being Independent from Productivity Criteriaen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of the Profit Criterionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of the Comparative Wage Criterionen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Considering Comparative Wages and Rival Firm’s Effect on Wage Outcomeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Considering Comparative Wages Effect on Wage Bargainingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis of Comparative Wages Role and their Effec on Wages at the Establishmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAnalysis Considering Comparative Wages and Their Role in Wage Determinationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determination Criteria Used in the Automotive Sectoren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determination Criteria Used in the Basic Metal Sectoren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determination Criteria Used in the Food and Beverages Sectoren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determination Criteria Used in the Rubber and Tire Sectoren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determination Criteria Used in the Chemical Sectoren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determination Criteria Used in the Chemical Sector (revised)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determination Criteria Used in the Paper Sectoren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determination Criteria Used in the Glass Sectoren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWage Determination Criteria Used in the Composite Sectorsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix A Results of Reliability Analysis of Scale Itemsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix B Results of Mann Whitney Analysis of Wage Criteriaen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix C Results of Mann Whitney Analysis of Fixing Wage Demandsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix D Results of Mann Whitney Analysis of Intervening Variablesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix E Results of Mann Whitney Analysis of Negative Factorsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix F Results of Mann Whitney Analysis of Advantage of Wage Policyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix G Results of Mann Whitney Analysis of Bargaining Poweren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix H Information Relating to Wage Increaseen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix I Analysis about Structure of Wageen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix J Employers/ Unions Approach to Payroll Taxesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix K Employers/ Unions Approach to Single Wageen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix L Criterion of Productivity in Wage Determinationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix M Profitability Criterion in Wage Determinationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix N Comparative Wages Criterion in Wage Determinationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix O Survey Form Applied to Labour Unionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAppendix P Survey Form Applied to Employers’ Unionsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsVitaen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFigure 2.1 The Labour Markeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFigure 2.2 Influences on Workplace Representative Roleen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFigure 2.3 Negotiating Encounteren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFigure 2.4 Distributive Bargaining Negotiation: First-year Base Wage Increaseen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFigure 3.1 Pay Equityen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFigure 5.1 A Conceptual Model Wage Bargaining Criteriaen_US
dc.identifier.citationSoykut Sarıca, Y. P. (2008). Wage determination under collective bargaining: Inflation, productivity and profitabgility relationships (an empirical study). İstanbul: Işık Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsüen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11729/1029
dc.institutionauthorSoykut Sarıca, Yeşim Pınaren_US
dc.institutionauthorid0000-0001-8349-607X
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIşık Üniversitesien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subject.lccHD6971.5 .S27 2008
dc.subject.lcshCollective bargaining.en_US
dc.subject.lcshCollective labor agreements.en_US
dc.titleWage determination under collective bargaining : inflation, productivity and profitabgility relationships (an empirical study)en_US
dc.title.alternativeToplu pazarlık sisteminde ücret belirleme: enflasyon, verimlilik ve kararlılık ilişkileri (Ampirik çalışma)en_US
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Yesim_Pinar_Soykut_Sarica.pdf
Boyut:
1.44 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
DoctoralThesis
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Tez Koleksiyonu