A software process assessment model and a tool for XP@SCRUM agile method

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.advisorKuru, Selahattinen_US
dc.contributor.authorUludağ, İbrahimen_US
dc.contributor.otherIşık Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Yüksek Lisans Programıen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-01T08:24:17Z
dc.date.available2016-06-01T08:24:17Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentIşık Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Yüksek Lisans Programıen_US
dc.descriptionText in English ; Abstract: Englishen_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 86-88)en_US
dc.descriptionxi, 91 leavesen_US
dc.description.abstractIn today's fast and competitive world, Agile Methods has become popular by software producers because for their high-speed, flexibility and responding to change quickly. These methods have been criticized as undisciplined way of hacking. However, these methods are disciplined processes that incorporate good engineer and management practices, albeit with extreme implementations tailored to a specific kind of environment. [35] Mark Paulk showed that organizations applying XP can reach CMM Level 2 and Level3. These methods do not have improvement guide and capability determination. There might be differences between the organizations applying these methods. In this thesis, I will propose a software process assessment model and a tool for proposed model. My approach is selecting an assessment model as a guide and selecting an agile method as target method.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsRoadmap of Thesisen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsBackgrounden_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSoftware Processen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProcess Assessmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAgile Methodologiesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsScrumen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroduction to Scrumen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsScrum Phasesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsHow Does Scrum Work?en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsScrum Rolesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsScrum Masteren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProduct Owneren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsScrum Teamen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsStakeholdersen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsScrum Practicesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsProduct Backlogen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDaily Scrumen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSprint Planning Meetingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSprinten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSprint Review Meetingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAdvantages of Scrumen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsExtreme Programmingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsExtreme Programming Process Modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsXP Valuesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCommunicationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSimplicityen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFeedbacken_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCourageen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsRespecten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCore Practicesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCoding Standarden_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCollective Code Ownershipen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsContinuous Integrationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesign Improvementen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSimple Designen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSmall releasesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSustainable Peaceen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSystem Metaphoren_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPair Programmingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPlanning Gameen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTest-Driven Developmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsWhole Teamen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsMethodology Comparisonen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsXP@SCRUMen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsBenefits of XP@SCRUMen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsXP@SCRUM Experiencesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsISO/IEC 15504en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroduction to ISO/IEC 15504en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSPICE document suiteen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsConcepts and introductory guideen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsA model for process managementen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsRating processen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsGuide to conducting assessmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsConstruction, selection and use of assessment instruments and toolsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsQualification and training of assessorsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsGuide for use in process improvementen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsGuide for use in determining supplier process capabilityen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsVocabularyen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsA Model of Process Assessment for XP@SCRUMen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsConcepts and Introductory Guideen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAssessment Modelen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsA Model for Process Management in XP@SCRUMen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsBase Practicesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCommunication Process Categoryen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPlanning Process Categoryen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDesigning Process Categoryen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsCoding Process Categoryen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTesting Process Categoryen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsRating Processen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsGuide to Process Assessmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsReviewing the assessment scopeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsSelecting Process Instancesen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPreparing for Assessmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsInformation Collecting and Validationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDetermining the Actual Ratingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsValidating Ratingsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPresenting Assessment Outputen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsComparison of ISO SPICE and XP@SCRUM PCIen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsA Tool for XP@SCRUM PCIen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAssessmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTechnical Detailsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAn Example Assessmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAssessment Scopeen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPreparing for Assessmenten_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsInformation Collecting and Validationen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsDetermining the Actual Ratingen_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPresenting Assessment Outputen_US
dc.identifier.citationUludağ, İ. (2006). A software process assessment model and a tool for XP@SCRUM agile method. İstanbul: Işık Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsüen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11729/897
dc.institutionauthorUludağ, İbrahimen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIşık Üniversitesien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryTezen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectAgile methodsen_US
dc.subjectCMMen_US
dc.subjectSoftware process assessmenten_US
dc.subject.lccQA76.75 .U48 2006
dc.subject.lcshComputer software -- Development.en_US
dc.subject.lcshComputer software -- Development -- Management.en_US
dc.subject.lcshSoftware engineering.en_US
dc.titleA software process assessment model and a tool for XP@SCRUM agile methoden_US
dc.typeMaster Thesisen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
897.pdf
Boyut:
929.34 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
MasterThesis
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Tez Koleksiyonu