A statistical approach to web usability analysis
dc.contributor.advisor | Perdahçı, Nazım Ziya | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Giritli, Efe Batur | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Işık Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Enformasyon Teknolojileri Yüksek Lisans Programı | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-01T08:38:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-01T08:38:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.department | Işık Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Enformasyon Teknolojileri Yüksek Lisans Programı | en_US |
dc.description | Text in English ; Abstract: English and Turkish | en_US |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 62) | en_US |
dc.description | x, 62 leaves | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A survey is conducted on 35 experienced Internet users to asset the usability of Turkish e-Commerce Web sites. The data is collected using a 28 questions survey consisting of three categories. ANOVA method is used for the analysis of the survey data. The analysis indicate that the first category that includes questions about the usability of Web sites include three subcategories for both of the web sites as far as the usability is concerned. According to the survey, in general, even advanced Internet users find Turkish e-Commerce sites slightly useable. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | 5 kişi üzerinde gerçekleştirilen bir anket ile Türkiye'deki e-ticaret sitelerinin bir kullanılabilirlik değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır. Üç ayrı kategori ve toplam 28 sorudan oluşan bir anket ile veri toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler ANOVA istatistiksel yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, anketin temelde kullanılabilirlik sorularından oluşan ilk kategorisinde, araştırma konusu olan her iki site için üç ayrı alt kategori olduğunu göstermiştir. Yapmış olduğumuz ankete istinaden genel olarak bakıldığında tecrübeli Internet kullanıcılarının dahi Türk e-ticaret sitelerini ancak çok az kullanışlı bulduğunu görüyoruz. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | INTRODUCTION | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WEB USABILITY | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHAT IS WEB USABILITY? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHY IS USABILITY IMPORTANT? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN USABILITY ENGINEERING AND USABILITY TESTING? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHAT STEPS ARE INVOLVED IN USABILITY? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Planning the Web Site | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Collecting Data from Users | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Developing Prototypes | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Collecting, Writing, or Revising Content | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Conducting Usability Tests | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Continuing to Assess the Site after It is | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHAT IS A USABILITY TEST LIKE? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | HOW MANY PARTICIPANTS ARE NEEDED FOR A USABILITY TEST? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHY SHOULD WE DO ITERATIVE USABILITY TESTING? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | INTRODUCTION TO WEB ACCESSIBLITY | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHAT IS WEB ACCESSIBILITY? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHY WEB ACCESSIBILITY IS IMPORTANT? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | MAKING THE WEB ACCESSIBLE | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF WEB ACCESSIBILITY | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | How Components Relate? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Interdependencies between Components | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | The Implementation Cycle | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | When One Component is Weak | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | OPTIMAL WEB DESIGN | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | HOW SHOULD INFORMATION BE POSITIONED IN A TYPICAL WEB SITE? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | HOW WEB SITE’S STRUCTURE CAN BE MORE NAVIGABLE? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | METHODS FOR DESIGNING USABLE WEB SITES | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | PLANNING THE SITE | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | What is the Reason for Developing Web Sites? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Who Should Come to the Site? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | When and Why They Will Come? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | COLLECTING DATA FROM USERS | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | What to Consider About Users? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Understanding and Comparing Techniques for Gathering Data from Users | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | EARLY USABILITY TESTS | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CONTEXTUAL INTERVIEWS | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHAT MAKES AN INTERVIEW SUCCESSFUL? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CONDUCTING AND USING USABILITY TESTS | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHAT IS USABILITY TESTING | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | TESTING GOALS | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | WHAT ARE THE STEPS IN USABILITY TESTING? | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ANALYSIS | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | THE SURVEY | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | The Questionnaire | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | THE GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF THE RESULTS | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE FIRST CATEGORY OF HEPSIBURADA | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE SECOND CATEGORY OF HEPSIBURADA | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE THIRD CATEGORY OF HEPSIBURADA | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE FIRST CATEGORY OF KANGURUM | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE SECOND CATEGORY OF KANGURUM | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR THE THIRD CATEGORY OF KANGURUM | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | THE ANOVA TEST | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ANOVA TEST FOR HEPSIBURADA CATEGORY 1 | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ANOVA TEST FOR HEPSIBURADA CATEGORY 2 | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ANOVA TEST FOR CATEGORY 3 | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ANOVA TEST FOR KANGURUM CATEGORY 1 | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ANOVA TEST FOR KANGURUM CATEGORY 2 | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ANOVA TEST FOR KANGURUM CATEGORY 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Giritli, E. B. (2007). A statistical approach to web usability analysis. İstanbul: Işık Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11729/899 | |
dc.institutionauthor | Giritli, Efe Batur | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Işık Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Tez | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject.lcc | HF5548.32 .G57 2007 | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Electronic commerce -- Turkey. | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Consumer behavior. | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Consumers' preferences. | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Business enterprises -- Computer networks. | en_US |
dc.title | A statistical approach to web usability analysis | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Web kullanılabilirlik analizine istatistiksel bir yaklaşım | en_US |
dc.type | Master Thesis | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |