Cognitive bias modification of attention is less effective under working memory load
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-7614-4519 | |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-0034-3885 | |
dc.contributor.author | Booth, Robert William | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mackintosh, Bundy | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mobini, Sirous | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Öztop, Pınar | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nunn, Samantha | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-01-15T23:02:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-01-15T23:02:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-07-20 | |
dc.department | Işık Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü | en_US |
dc.department | Işık University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Cognitive bias modification for attentional bias (CBM-A) attempts to alleviate anxiety by training an attentional bias away from threat. Several authors have argued that CBM-A in fact trains top-down, reactive counteraction of the tendency to orient towards threat. Imposing a working memory (WM) load during training should therefore limit its efficacy, since WM resources are required for goal-driven control of attention. Twenty-eight subclinical high-anxious participants completed two sessions of CBM-A or placebo training: one under a high WM load, and one under a low WM load. Attentional bias was assessed after each training. CBM-A produced an attentional bias away from threat under low load, but not under high load. These results suggest CBM-A trains top-down counteraction of orienting to threat. It also suggests the administration of CBM-A in the home environment may be affected by everyday worries and distractions. | en_US |
dc.description.version | Publisher's Version | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Booth, R. W., Mackintosh, B., Mobini, S., Öztop, P. & Nunn, S. (2014). Cognitive bias modification of attention is less effective under working memory load. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(6), 634-639. doi:10.1007/s10608-014-9628-6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10608-014-9628-6 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 639 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0147-5916 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-2819 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84939894209 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 634 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11729/509 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9628-6 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 38 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000345005100006 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Booth, Robert William | en_US |
dc.institutionauthorid | 0000-0001-7614-4519 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.peerreviewed | Yes | en_US |
dc.publicationstatus | Published | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer New York LLC | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cognitive Therapy and Research | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Cognitive bias modification | en_US |
dc.subject | Attentional bias | en_US |
dc.subject | Anxiety | en_US |
dc.subject | Working memory | en_US |
dc.subject | Generalized anxiety disorder | en_US |
dc.subject | Modification program | en_US |
dc.subject | Emotional disorders | en_US |
dc.subject | Selective attention | en_US |
dc.subject | Individuals | en_US |
dc.subject | Vulnerability | en_US |
dc.subject | Activation | en_US |
dc.subject | Stimuli | en_US |
dc.subject | Smokers | en_US |
dc.subject | Threat | en_US |
dc.title | Cognitive bias modification of attention is less effective under working memory load | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
- İsim:
- 509.pdf
- Boyut:
- 266.83 KB
- Biçim:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Açıklama:
- Publisher's Version