Hukukçu bilirkişi atanması yasağı ve bu yasağın iptalinin reddine ilişkin anayasa mahkemesi kararının değerlendirilmesi
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2022
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Legal Yayıncılık San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti.
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Özet
Yeni düzenlemelerle, yeni bir bilirkişilik sistemi benimsenmiş, hu-kukçu bilirkişinin atanması yasaklanmıştır. Bazı mahkemelerce; yasağın iptali için Anayasa Mahkemesine başvurulmuştur. Anayasa Mahkemesi tarafından genel bilgi veya tecrübeyle ya da hâkimlik mesleğinin gerek-tirdiği hukuki bilgiyle çözümlenmesi mümkün olan konularda bilirkişiye başvurulamayacağı gerekçeleriyle yapılan başvuru reddedilmiştir. Ancak fiili gerçeklikle uyuşmayan ve ihtiyaca cevap vermeyen bu yasağın daha önceki düzenlemeler gibi uygulama olanağı yoktur.
With the introduction of new regulations, a new expert system was adopted, and the appointment of legal experts was prohibited. An appli-cation was made by some courts to the Constitutional Court for the an-nulment of the ban. The application made to the Constitutional Court, which was based on the rationale that it was not possible to appoint an expert in matters that could be resolved with general knowledge, expe-rience, or with the legal knowledge required by the judicial profession, was rejected. However, this prohibition, which does not comply with actual realities and hence does not meet the practical necessities, cannot be implemented as with previous regulations.
With the introduction of new regulations, a new expert system was adopted, and the appointment of legal experts was prohibited. An appli-cation was made by some courts to the Constitutional Court for the an-nulment of the ban. The application made to the Constitutional Court, which was based on the rationale that it was not possible to appoint an expert in matters that could be resolved with general knowledge, expe-rience, or with the legal knowledge required by the judicial profession, was rejected. However, this prohibition, which does not comply with actual realities and hence does not meet the practical necessities, cannot be implemented as with previous regulations.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Hukukçu bilirkişi, Bilirkişi atanma yasağı, Bilirkişi atanma nedenleri, Legal expert, Prohibition of appointing legal experts, Reasons for appointing legal experts
Kaynak
Legal Hukuk Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
20
Sayı
231
Künye
Çelik, A. (2022). Hukukçu bilirkişi atanması yasağı ve bu yasağın iptalinin reddine ilişkin anayasa mahkemesi kararının değerlendirilmesi. Legal Hukuk Dergisi, 20(231), 797-846. doi:
