Arama Sonuçları

Listeleniyor 1 - 10 / 11
  • Yayın
    Calculating the VC-dimension of decision trees
    (IEEE, 2009) Aslan, Özlem; Yıldız, Olcay Taner; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    We propose an exhaustive search algorithm that calculates the VC-dimension of univariate decision trees with binary features. The VC-dimension of the univariate decision tree with binary features depends on (i) the VC-dimension values of the left and right subtrees, (ii) the number of inputs, and (iii) the number of nodes in the tree. From a training set of example trees whose VC-dimensions are calculated by exhaustive search, we fit a general regressor to estimate the VC-dimension of any binary tree. These VC-dimension estimates are then used to get VC-generalization bounds for complexity control using SRM in decision trees, i.e., pruning. Our simulation results shows that SRM-pruning using the estimated VC-dimensions finds trees that are as accurate as those pruned using cross-validation.
  • Yayın
    Soft decision trees
    (IEEE, 2012) İrsoy, Ozan; Yıldız, Olcay Taner; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    We discuss a novel decision tree architecture with soft decisions at the internal nodes where we choose both children with probabilities given by a sigmoid gating function. Our algorithm is incremental where new nodes are added when needed and parameters are learned using gradient-descent. We visualize the soft tree fit on a toy data set and then compare it with the canonical, hard decision tree over ten regression and classification data sets. Our proposed model has significantly higher accuracy using fewer nodes.
  • Yayın
    Budding trees
    (IEEE Computer Soc, 2014-08-24) İrsoy, Ozan; Yıldız, Olcay Taner; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    We propose a new decision tree model, named the budding tree, where a node can be both a leaf and an internal decision node. Each bud node starts as a leaf node, can then grow children, but then later on, if necessary, its children can be pruned. This contrasts with traditional tree construction algorithms that only grows the tree during the training phase, and prunes it in a separate pruning phase. We use a soft tree architecture and show that the tree and its parameters can be trained using gradient-descent. Our experimental results on regression, binary classification, and multi-class classification data sets indicate that our newly proposed model has better performance than traditional trees in terms of accuracy while inducing trees of comparable size.
  • Yayın
    Multivariate statistical tests for comparing classification algorithms
    (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011) Yıldız, Olcay Taner; Aslan, Özlem; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    The misclassification error which is usually used in tests to compare classification algorithms, does not make a distinction between the sources of error, namely, false positives and false negatives. Instead of summing these in a single number, we propose to collect multivariate statistics and use multivariate tests on them. Information retrieval uses the measures of precision and recall, and signal detection uses true positive rate (tpr) and false positive rate (fpr) and a multivariate test can also use such two values instead of combining them in a single value, such as error or average precision. For example, we can have bivariate tests for (precision, recall) or (tpr, fpr). We propose to use the pairwise test based on Hotelling's multivariate T test to compare two algorithms or multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to compare L > 2 algorithms. In our experiments, we show that the multivariate tests have higher power than the univariate error test, that is, they can detect differences that the error test cannot, and we also discuss how the decisions made by different multivariate tests differ, to be able to point out where to use which. We also show how multivariate or univariate pairwise tests can be used as post-hoc tests after MANOVA to find cliques of algorithms, or order them along separate dimensions.
  • Yayın
    Regularizing soft decision trees
    (Springer, 2013) Yıldız, Olcay Taner; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    Recently, we have proposed a new decision tree family called soft decision trees where a node chooses both its left and right children with different probabilities as given by a gating function, different from a hard decision node which chooses one of the two. In this paper, we extend the original algorithm by introducing local dimension reduction via L-1 and L-2 regularization for feature selection and smoother fitting. We compare our novel approach with the standard decision tree algorithms over 27 classification data sets. We see that both regularized versions have similar generalization ability with less complexity in terms of number of nodes, where L-2 seems to work slightly better than L-1.
  • Yayın
    Design and analysis of classifier learning experiments in bioinformatics: survey and case studies
    (IEEE Computer Soc, 2012-12) İrsoy, Ozan; Yıldız, Olcay Taner; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    In many bioinformatics applications, it is important to assess and compare the performances of algorithms trained from data, to be able to draw conclusions unaffected by chance and are therefore significant. Both the design of such experiments and the analysis of the resulting data using statistical tests should be done carefully for the results to carry significance. In this paper, we first review the performance measures used in classification, the basics of experiment design and statistical tests. We then give the results of our survey over 1,500 papers published in the last two years in three bioinformatics journals (including this one). Although the basics of experiment design are well understood, such as resampling instead of using a single training set and the use of different performance metrics instead of error, only 21 percent of the papers use any statistical test for comparison. In the third part, we analyze four different scenarios which we encounter frequently in the bioinformatics literature, discussing the proper statistical methodology as well as showing an example case study for each. With the supplementary software, we hope that the guidelines we discuss will play an important role in future studies.
  • Yayın
    Incremental construction of classifier and discriminant ensembles
    (Elsevier Science Inc, 2009-04-15) Ulaş, Aydın; Semerci, Murat; Yıldız, Olcay Taner; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    We discuss approaches to incrementally construct an ensemble. The first constructs an ensemble of classifiers choosing a subset from a larger set, and the second constructs an ensemble of discriminants, where a classifier is used for some classes only. We investigate criteria including accuracy, significant improvement, diversity, correlation, and the role of search direction. For discriminant ensembles, we test subset selection and trees. Fusion is by voting or by a linear model. Using 14 classifiers on 38 data sets. incremental search finds small, accurate ensembles in polynomial time. The discriminant ensemble uses a subset of discriminants and is simpler, interpretable, and accurate. We see that an incremental ensemble has higher accuracy than bagging and random subspace method; and it has a comparable accuracy to AdaBoost. but fewer classifiers.
  • Yayın
    Cost-conscious comparison of supervised learning algorithms over multiple data sets
    (Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2012-04) Ulaş, Aydın; Yıldız, Olcay Taner; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    In the literature, there exist statistical tests to compare supervised learning algorithms on multiple data sets in terms of accuracy but they do not always generate an ordering. We propose Multi(2)Test, a generalization of our previous work, for ordering multiple learning algorithms on multiple data sets from "best" to "worst" where our goodness measure is composed of a prior cost term additional to generalization error. Our simulations show that Multi2Test generates orderings using pairwise tests on error and different types of cost using time and space complexity of the learning algorithms.
  • Yayın
    Eigenclassifiers for combining correlated classifiers
    (Elsevier Science Inc, 2012-03-15) Ulaş, Aydın; Yıldız, Olcay Taner; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    In practice, classifiers in an ensemble are not independent. This paper is the continuation of our previous work on ensemble subset selection [A. Ulas, M. Semerci, O.T. Yildiz, E. Alpaydin, Incremental construction of classifier and discriminant ensembles, Information Sciences, 179 (9) (2009) 1298-1318] and has two parts: first, we investigate the effect of four factors on correlation: (i) algorithms used for training, (ii) hyperparameters of the algorithms, (iii) resampled training sets, (iv) input feature subsets. Simulations using 14 classifiers on 38 data sets indicate that hyperparameters and overlapping training sets have higher effect on positive correlation than features and algorithms. Second, we propose postprocessing before fusing using principal component analysis (PCA) to form uncorrelated eigenclassifiers from a set of correlated experts. Combining the information from all classifiers may be better than subset selection where some base classifiers are pruned before combination, because using all allows redundancy.
  • Yayın
    Bagging soft decision trees
    (Springer Verlag, 2016) Yıldız, Olcay Taner; İrsoy, Ozan; Alpaydın, Ahmet İbrahim Ethem
    The decision tree is one of the earliest predictive models in machine learning. In the soft decision tree, based on the hierarchical mixture of experts model, internal binary nodes take soft decisions and choose both children with probabilities given by a sigmoid gating function. Hence for an input, all the paths to all the leaves are traversed and all those leaves contribute to the final decision but with different probabilities, as given by the gating values on the path. Tree induction is incremental and the tree grows when needed by replacing leaves with subtrees and the parameters of the newly-added nodes are learned using gradient-descent. We have previously shown that such soft trees generalize better than hard trees; here, we propose to bag such soft decision trees for higher accuracy. On 27 two-class classification data sets (ten of which are from the medical domain), and 26 regression data sets, we show that the bagged soft trees generalize better than single soft trees and bagged hard trees. This contribution falls in the scope of research track 2 listed in the editorial, namely, machine learning algorithms.